MIRECC / CoE
Newsletter | Spring 2026 Article 2 | South Central MIRECC
Grant Writing Scholars 2026
In February, the 2026 class of SC MIRECC Grant Writing Scholars (GWS) participated in a virtual grant writing workshop. The GWS program provides investigators with individual mentoring and didactic training in successful grant writing. The program prepares scholars for submitting grants to funding agencies such as SC MIRECC, VA Health Services Research, and the National Institutes of Health.
Dr. Natalie Hundt, the SC MIRECC Associate Director for Research Training, directs the GWS program. Members of the 2026 GWS class are:
- Alexis Childs, PsyD (Little Rock, Arkansas)
- Giselle Day, PhD (Houston, Texas)
- Henry Heisey, MD, MPH (Houston, Texas)
- Lourence Misedah-Robinson, DrPH, MPH (Houston, Texas)
- Joseph Tu, PhD (Houston, Texas)
Scholars completed a program evaluation at the end of the workshop:
| Program Evaluation | Average (1-10) |
|---|---|
| I can describe characteristics of well-written grant proposals | 9.00 |
| I am aware of strategies to improve grant proposals | 9.40 |
| I found writing a draft grant proposal for review motivating | 8.40 |
| I found writing a draft grant proposal for review useful | 9.60 |
| I found the provided book on successful grant writing motivating | 8.00 |
| I found the provided book on successful grant writing useful | 8.00 |
| I found receiving reviewer comments on my draft grant proposal motivating | 8.20 |
| I found receiving reviewer comments on my draft grant proposal useful | 9.60 |
| I found discussing comments with reviewer motivating | 8.60 |
| I found discussing comments with reviewer useful | 9.60 |
| I found the virtual meeting presentation motivating | 9.00 |
| I found the virtual meeting presentation useful | 10.00 |
Scholars also gave feedback about how they benefitted from the program, including:
- I think the Grant Writing Scholars was extremely helpful in preparing my current and future grant proposals. Each speaker for the virtual meeting had very clear, easy to apply and implement tips and advice to make a stand-out grant proposal. The meeting to discuss comments on my specific grant proposal draft with a primary reviewer was unbelievably helpful and I received feedback that I will hold on to for future grants.
- Submitting a draft of a section of a grant, receiving reviewer feedback, and meeting with the reviewer were the most helpful components.
- I would say to a great extent. The GWS program shored-up my understanding of core concepts from conceptualization, structure, to the refining process for competitive grant proposals.
After the workshop, scholars further refined their proposals, which will be submitted to various funding agencies.
Last updated: May 5, 2026
In this Issue
— SC MIRECC Core Update
— Grant Writing Scholars 2026
— The Veteran’s Voice
— New MIDAS Director
— Clinical Input Committee
— Free CE: CBOC MH Grand Rounds Webinar Series
— Anchor Site Highlights
— Free Clinical Education Resources
— Publication Highlights
— Pilot Grant Opportunity
— MIDAS Consultation Program
SC MIRECC Menu
Home
About
Leadership & Staff
Anchor Sites
Research
Research Training
Houston Fellowship
Little Rock Fellowship
Fellows
Grant Writing Scholars
Education
CBOC Grand Rounds
Grant Program
Education Products
New and Featured
Products by Topic
Order
Clinical Care
Newsletter
News Flash
PACERS
Veteran Engagement and Access
Older Veterans
Women Veterans
Veterans and Families



















